Givenchy Gentleman Eau de Parfum 100ml
Get 404 LF Beauty Plus+ Points
RRP: £101.00 Current price: £80.80
Save £ 20.20 ( 20% Off )
Or 4 interest free payments of £20.20 with clearpay
In stock | Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Ignite the senses with the Givenchy Gentleman Eau de Parfum. Hailing the charismatic charm of the ‘Gentleman’, the enticing scent expresses a timeless trail of rich, woody accords.
Spicy notes of black pepper mingle with gentle lavender accords, creating an explosive dynamic from the opening note. Smooth peru balm balances with orris concrete to offer warming undertones. The fragrance settles on an indulgent base of black vanilla and patchouli, enhancing the enticing aroma.
Fragrance Family: Woody Floral Balmy
Top Notes: Pepper Essence, Lavender.
Heart Notes: Orris Concrete, Peru Balm.
Base Notes: Patchouli Essence, Black Vanilla.
Frequently Bought Together
This item
Givenchy Gentleman Eau de Parfum 100ml
RRP: £101.00 Current price: £80.80
Save £20.20 ( 20% Off )
Other Customers Bought
113
£82.00
78
RRP: £97.00Current price: £82.45
657
RRP: £36.50Current price: £29.20
561
£28.00
912
£12.50
RRP: £40.00Current price: £32.00
Customer Reviews
3
5
4
3
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
Top Customer Reviews
Where reviews refer to foods or cosmetic products, results may vary from person to person. Customer reviews are and do not represent the views of The Hut Group.
Smells nice but doesn’t last long
The aftershave smells nice but would expect the smell to last longer seems as it’s a premium brand
by Joe Verified Purchase
Was this helpful?
Amazing
Smells amazing perfect scent. I received a small sample before. And had to order it for my partners birthday. Sexy smell that lasts all day.
by victoria Verified Purchase
Was this helpful?
Perfect for evenings
I have quite a few Givenchy fragrance and find this one works best for the evening as it's a very distinctive and long lasting scent, which makes it great when going out for dinner and drinks. I've had a lot of compliments on this fragrance, so will definitely be getting again
by Rich
Was this helpful?